THIS PAGE AdobeRGB PROFILE - Untagged JPEGS
This page has an embedded ICC PROFILE: Adobe RGB
This page's JPEGs are all untagged, as noted.

The theory is color-managed web browsers, like *Safari, will Honor the embedded Page ICC Profile display the untagged AdobeRGB correctly.

The untagged AppleRGB and sRGB should look whacked because (a color-managed) web browser is Assigning/Assuming AdobeRGB to them through the embedded Page profile.

This test includes four test pages:
NO Profile - sRGB Profile - AdobeRGB Profile - AppleRGB Profile

I GAVE UP ON THIS SERIES BECAUSE it got hard to explain and profiles embedded in html Web pages didn't work.
PLEASE SEE THIS PAGE FOR FINISHED PROJECT:
JPEGS with Embedded Profiles
Untagged sRGB should only look good on calibrated 2.2 gamma monitors that do not support color management. Because of the page-embedded AdobeRGB profile, page-embedded supported browsers will whack this untagged sRGB out.
Untagged AppleRGB should only look good on calibrated 1.8 gamma monitors that do not support color management. Because of the page-embedded AdobeRGB profile, page-embedded supported browsers will whack this untagged AppleRGB out.
Untagged AdobeRGB should look good on all color-managed browsers that support page-embedded profiles. It will look desaturated on browsers that do not support page-embedded profiles.

*Safari 1.25, 10.3x does NOT support page-embedded profiles.
Explorer 5.2 does, and it displays this page as expected.

For information on these Photodisc/Getty files and basic Assign-Convert-Assume color-management theory, please see Photoshop tutorial

www.gballard.net